If you work with interlaced source footage, the quality of your deinterlacing filter is one of the key components to final compressed quality. Unfortunately for Sorenson Squeeze users, the quality of Squeeze's deinterlacing filters prior to version 5

Sorenson Boosts Squeeze 5.1’s Deinterlacing Quality

If you work with interlaced source footage, the quality of your deinterlacing filter is one of the key components to final compressed quality. Unfortunately for Sorenson Squeeze users, the quality of Squeeze’s deinterlacing filters prior to version 5.1 was subpar. If you knew about the problem, you could deinterlace in your editor when producing an intermediate file and avoid the problem. Otherwise, your overall quality was potentially degraded by jaggies like that shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1. Note the random jaggies on the lower right.

I’m happy to report that starting with version 5.1, Sorenson has largely resolved this issue. The updated deinterlacing filter isn’t perfect, but none are, and it’s on par with the quality produced by Premiere Pro.

What about Final Cut Studio? That’s a tougher issue for another day, because though Compressor’s Optical Flow technology produces outstanding quality, the glacial processing times make it commercially unusable for most projects. Other options are very close in quality to Premiere Pro, but again, I’ll detail those another day.

Back in Squeeze, note that the updated filter is available in version 5.1, which is currently a free download at www.sorensonmedia.com/downloads. The setting that produced the best results is shown in Figure 2.


Figure 2. Squeeze’s updated Deinterlace control.

I’ve included some examples comparing Squeeze 5.0, Squeeze 5.1, Premiere Pro and AfterEffects using the now off the market AlgoSuite plug-in, which is my gold standard. Note that these files are from an interlaced source torture test that I created a few years ago and use to test the deinterlacing features of streaming encoders. In terms of procedure, I input the file and produce a 640×480 file in either uncompressed format (like Apple Animation) or the highest quality compressed format supported by the tool.

Click each thumbnail to view the full screen image. You’ll see dramatic improvement between the newest Squeeze version (top left) and the older (bottom left), with Premiere Pro on the lower right and AlgoSuite on the upper right.




The only problem that I found was random blocks in one scene, as shown in Figure 3. These are extremely transient artifacts that most viewers wouldn’t notice, but they’re clear in the still frame shot.


Figure 3. Random blocks on hard edges in this sequence were the only artifacts that I saw.

In previous versions of Squeeze, jaggy artifacts were so prevalent that it was tough to recommend deinterlacing in Squeeze. With the update, I would deinterlace where it was most convenient, and not work around this deficit as I have in the past.

About Jan Ozer

Avatar photo
I help companies train new technical hires in streaming media-related positions; I also help companies optimize their codec selections and encoding stacks and evaluate new encoders and codecs. I am a contributing editor to Streaming Media Magazine, writing about codecs and encoding tools. I have written multiple authoritative books on video encoding, including Video Encoding by the Numbers: Eliminate the Guesswork from your Streaming Video (https://amzn.to/3kV6R1j) and Learn to Produce Video with FFmpeg: In Thirty Minutes or Less (https://amzn.to/3ZJih7e). I have multiple courses relating to streaming media production, all available at https://bit.ly/slc_courses. I currently work as www.netint.com as a Senior Director in Marketing.

Check Also

Steve Strong Details Norsk's Suitability for Broadcasters

Norsk for Broadcasters: Interview with id3as’ Steve Strong

Recently, I spoke with Steve Strong, id3as’ co-founder and director, about Norsk’s suitability for broadcasters. …

Five star review for video quality metrics course.

New Five Star Review for Video Quality Metrics Course

The Computing and Using Video Quality Metrics course teaches encoding pro to compute and use video metrics like VMAF, PSNR, and SSIM.

Figure shows the different components to live streaming latency.

The Quality Cost of Low-Latency Transcoding

While low-latency transcoding sounds desirable, low-latency transcode settings can reduce quality and may not noticeably …

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *