I recently tested the Deep Render AI codec and issued a report, which you can read here. The bottom line was that in the tested low-latency use case, the Deep Render AI codec substantially outperformed SVT-AV1 quality-wise and was only slightly behind VVenC. While the codec lacks features like bitrate control that are necessary for most deployments, it offers outstanding integration …

Streaming Media recently published my article on VVC and AV1, Software Decoding and the Future of Mobile Video. An honest evaluation of the article might observe that while the quality comparisons between SVT-AV1 and VVenC were relatively complete, the article didn’t share any mobile playback performance data. That’s because I couldn’t find any VVC players for testing on either mobile platform.  …

Recently, I reviewed the Deep Render AI codec and noticed a substantial disconnect between subjective and objective results. Subjective testing showed Deep Render with a 45 percent BD-Rate advantage over SVT-AV1. VMAF showed just 3 percent. While subjective evaluation has always been the gold standard, this gap forced a more basic question: how accurate are traditional objective metrics when applied …