Recently, I reviewed the Deep Render AI codec and noticed a substantial disconnect between subjective and objective results. Subjective testing showed Deep Render with a 45 percent BD-Rate advantage over SVT-AV1. VMAF showed just 3 percent. While subjective evaluation has always been the gold standard, this gap forced a more basic question: how accurate are traditional objective metrics when applied …

While many AI-based codecs are still making their first appearance in white papers, often with tortured playback requirements and no working decoder, the Deep Render codec is already encoding in FFmpeg, playing in VLC, and running on the billions of NPU-enabled devices already in the market. Let’s take a step back. I’ve been following the development of the Deep Render …

If you’re optimizing x265 for speed, enabling Wavefront Parallel Processing (WPP) looks like a no-brainer. Table 1 shows a staggering 7.3x improvement in encoding time. A 3:15 encode with WPP turns into a painful 23:51 without it. The quality penalty? Negligible. VMAF drops just 0.19, with the low-frame VMAF off by only 0.77  (low-frame is the lowest VMAF score of …