CSAI vs SSAI in Video Ad Insertion: A Comprehensive Guide with Recommendations

Introduction

Ad insertion technologies play a crucial role in monetization strategies. Two primary methods dominate this space: Client-Side Ad Insertion (CSAI) and Server-Side Ad Insertion (SSAI). Understanding the differences, benefits, and challenges can help content providers optimize their ad delivery for user experience and revenue generation.

Overview of Ad Insertion

Ad insertion is the process of integrating advertisements into video content. It serves as a monetization strategy for content providers, allowing them to generate revenue while offering free or subscription-based content to viewers. The two main approaches are CSAI and SSAI, each with unique characteristics.

Comparison Table

Feature CSAI (Client-Side Ad Insertion) SSAI (Server-Side Ad Insertion)
Ad Insertion Process Ads inserted on the viewer’s device Ads stitched into the content stream on server
Personalization High level of personalization Limited personalization capabilities
Ad Blocking Susceptible to ad blockers More resistant to ad blockers
Latency Potential for buffering and latency Smoother playback with less buffering
User Experience May have interruptions during ad loading Seamless transition between content and ads
Analytics & Tracking Detailed, real-time analytics Limited tracking capabilities
Ad Format Support Supports various ad formats (interactive, skippable) Limited support for interactive ad formats
Device Compatibility May have issues with older devices Consistent across various devices
Bandwidth Usage Can be bandwidth-intensive More efficient bandwidth usage
Implementation Complexity Simpler to implement More complex setup required
Cost Generally lower cost Typically higher cost
Real-time Decision Making Supports real-time ad decisions Limited real-time capabilities
Live Streaming Suitability Less suitable for live content Ideal for live and linear content
Ad Revenue Potential May have lower fill rates due to blockers Higher potential for ad impressions
GDPR Compliance May expose user data to third parties Better control over user data sharing
Scalability May face challenges with high traffic Highly scalable for large audiences
SDK Requirement Often requires SDK integration Can work without SDK (codeless)
Ad Decisioning Happens on client device Occurs on the server
Viewer Data Usage Uses real-time viewer data Limited use of real-time viewer data
Content Rights Management Easier to manage regional restrictions More complex rights management

Detailed Explanation of Features

Ad Insertion Process

CSAI: In CSAI, ads are inserted on the viewer’s device. When a user watches a video, the video player sends an ad request to the ad server. The server responds with the ad, which is then stitched into the video stream on the client side. This method allows for real-time ad decisioning and personalization based on the user’s behavior and preferences. However, it can lead to issues with ad blockers and buffering.

Figure 1. Client-side adds insertion from OTTVerse.

SSAI: In SSAI, ads are stitched into the content stream on the server before reaching the viewer. The ad content is pre-processed and delivered as part of the video stream. This method ensures a seamless viewing experience with fewer interruptions and is more resistant to ad blockers. However, it offers limited real-time personalization and can be more complex to implement.

Figure 2. Server-side ad insertion splices the ad into the stream before it gets to the viewer. Also from OTTVerse.

Personalization

CSAI: CSAI allows for a high level of ad personalization. Since ads are inserted on the client side, they can be tailored to the individual viewer based on real-time data such as location, browsing history, and user behavior. This can lead to higher engagement and better ad performance.

SSAI: SSAI offers limited personalization capabilities. Since ads are stitched into the stream on the server, they are typically less targeted and more generic. While some level of personalization is possible, it is not as granular as with CSAI.

Ad Blocking

CSAI: CSAI is susceptible to ad blockers. Since ads are inserted on the client side, they can be detected and blocked by ad-blocking software. This can significantly reduce the number of ads served and impact revenue.

SSAI: SSAI is more resistant to ad blockers. Ads are integrated into the video stream on the server, making it difficult for ad-blocking software to distinguish between content and ads.

Latency

CSAI: CSAI can introduce latency and buffering issues. Since ads are fetched and inserted on the client side, there can be delays in ad loading, leading to interruptions in the viewing experience.

SSAI: SSAI provides smoother playback with less buffering. Ads are pre-stitched into the content stream on the server, ensuring a seamless transition between content and ads without additional loading times.

User Experience

CSAI: The user experience with CSAI can be interrupted by ad loading and buffering issues. However, the high level of personalization can enhance the relevance and engagement of the ads.

SSAI: SSAI offers a seamless user experience with smooth transitions between content and ads. This method is less likely to cause interruptions, providing a TV-like viewing experience.

Analytics & Tracking

CSAI: CSAI provides detailed, real-time analytics. Since ads are served on the client side, data on user interactions and ad performance can be collected and analyzed in real-time.

SSAI: SSAI offers limited tracking capabilities. While some data can be collected on the server side, it is not as detailed or real-time as with CSAI.

Ad Format Support

CSAI: CSAI supports various ad formats, including interactive and skippable ads. This flexibility allows for a wide range of ad experiences tailored to the viewer’s preferences.

SSAI: SSAI has limited support for interactive ad formats. Since ads are pre-stitched into the content stream, there is less flexibility in delivering interactive ad experiences.

Device Compatibility

CSAI: CSAI may have issues with older devices. The client-side processing required for ad insertion can be resource-intensive, leading to performance issues on less capable devices.

SSAI: SSAI offers consistent performance across various devices. Since ads are integrated on the server side, the processing burden on the viewer’s device is minimized.

Bandwidth Usage

CSAI: CSAI can be bandwidth-intensive. Ads are fetched separately from the content stream, leading to additional data usage.

SSAI: SSAI is more efficient in bandwidth usage. Ads are pre-stitched into the content stream, reducing the need for additional data fetching.

Implementation Complexity

CSAI: CSAI is simpler to implement. The ad insertion process is handled on the client side, requiring less complex server-side infrastructure.

SSAI: SSAI requires a more complex setup. The server-side infrastructure must be capable of stitching ads into the content stream in real-time.

Cost

CSAI: CSAI is generally lower cost. The more straightforward implementation and lower infrastructure requirements make it a cost-effective option for many content providers.

SSAI: SSAI typically has higher costs. The complex server-side infrastructure and processing requirements can lead to increased expenses.

Real-time Decision Making

CSAI: CSAI supports real-time ad decisions. Ads can be tailored to the viewer’s current context and behavior, enhancing relevance and engagement.

SSAI: SSAI has limited real-time capabilities. Ads are pre-stitched into the content stream, reducing the ability to make real-time adjustments.

Live Streaming Suitability

CSAI: CSAI is less suitable for live content. The potential for buffering and latency issues can disrupt the live viewing experience.

SSAI: SSAI is ideal for live and linear content. The seamless ad insertion and resistance to ad blockers make it well-suited for live streaming scenarios.

Ad Revenue Potential

CSAI: CSAI may have lower fill rates due to ad blockers. The susceptibility to ad blocking software can reduce the number of ads served and impact revenue.

SSAI: SSAI offers higher potential for ad impressions. The resistance to ad blockers ensures that more ads are delivered and viewed.

GDPR Compliance

CSAI: CSAI may expose user data to third parties. The client-side ad insertion process can involve sharing user data with multiple ad servers.

SSAI: SSAI offers better control over user data sharing. The server-side processing minimizes the exposure of user data to third parties.

Scalability

CSAI: CSAI may face challenges with high traffic. The client-side processing required for ad insertion can lead to performance issues under heavy load.

SSAI: SSAI is highly scalable for large audiences. The server-side infrastructure can handle high traffic volumes more efficiently.

SDK Requirement

CSAI: CSAI often requires SDK integration. The client-side ad insertion process typically involves integrating a software development kit (SDK) into the video player.

SSAI: SSAI can work without SDK (codeless). The server-side ad insertion process does not require client-side SDK integration, simplifying implementation.

Ad Decisioning

CSAI: Ad decisioning happens on the client device. The video player makes real-time decisions about which ads to insert based on user data.

SSAI: Ad decisioning occurs on the server. The server pre-determines which ads to stitch into the content stream before delivering it to the viewer.

Viewer Data Usage

CSAI: CSAI uses real-time viewer data. The client-side ad insertion process allows for real-time data collection and analysis.

SSAI: SSAI has limited use of real-time viewer data. The server-side ad insertion process relies on pre-collected data, reducing the ability to make real-time adjustments.

Content Rights Management

CSAI: CSAI makes it easier to manage regional restrictions. The client-side ad insertion process allows for dynamic adjustments based on the viewer’s location.

SSAI: SSAI involves more complex rights management. The server-side ad insertion process requires pre-determined content rights and restrictions.

Decision Tree with Sourced Recommendations

Live Streaming

Recommendation: SSAI

Source: JW Player

Quote: “For live streaming, SSAI might be the way to go for several reasons:

  • A seamless broadcast experience: Ad stitching is done at the server level, meaning ads and video content are delivered as a singular package. This allows precise ad insertion while still providing an uninterrupted streaming experience.
  • It does the hard work for you: With the diversity of devices that users employ to access video content, SSAI ensures ads are always delivered, regardless of the technical hurdles each device might put up.
  • Ad blocker-proof: When ads are seamlessly integrated into the content, ad-blocking software simply can’t decipher where content ends and ads begin. This makes it virtually impossible for ad blockers to work on video content delivered via SSAI.
  • Personalization: SSAI still allows for extended layers of ad personalization depending on a number of factors; Device, Geolocation, Time of day, OTT app.”

Source: JW Player

Video on Demand (VOD) Content

Recommendation: Consider both CSAI and SSAI based on specific needs

Source: JW Player

Quote: “CSAI allows for more granular targeting than SSAI as it can target the viewer based on actual demographic elements such as geographic location and user behavior. This is especially effective for niche industries operating in local markets. Targeting becomes much more effective when advertisers can reach viewers down to the zip code.

One of CSAI’s significant advantages is its ability to tailor ads to individual viewers. By making use of real-time data and user behavior during the stream, CSAI can deliver personalized ads, which enhances the relevance of the ad and the engagement with it.” Source: JW Player

Source: Broadpeak

Quote: “SSAI allows for ad personalization, better video quality, and the opportunity to get all advertisements seen by the viewer. The drawback is it can be more resource intensive due to transcoding and packaging.” Source: Broadpeak

Platforms Prioritizing Ad Analytics

Recommendation: CSAI

Source: JW Player

Quote: “CSAI allows users to maintain total control and flexibility over performance measurement since the ad delivery is done at the device level. And since data is procured from the device, it’s generally more accurate than SSAI-enabled ad delivery systems.

Further, client-side players offer many options regarding ad formats, media files, and interactive elements.” Source: JW Player

What About Server-Guided Ad Insertion (SGAI)?

While this article focuses on Client-Side Ad Insertion (CSAI) and Server-Side Ad Insertion (SSAI), a newer hybrid approach called Server-Guided Ad Insertion (SGAI) is gaining attention. SGAI combines the strengths of both methods, leveraging server-side decisioning with client-side execution to deliver a balance of seamless playback, personalization, and ad-blocker resistance.

SGAI enables servers to guide ad placement while allowing the client to make real-time adjustments based on user behavior and context. This approach addresses some of the personalization limitations of SSAI while retaining its ability to bypass ad blockers and provide a smooth user experience. Although still emerging, SGAI could represent the next step in ad insertion technologies.

Stay tuned—we’ll dive deeper into SGAI and its implications in a future article.

About Jan Ozer

Avatar photo
I help companies train new technical hires in streaming media-related positions; I also help companies optimize their codec selections and encoding stacks and evaluate new encoders and codecs. I am a contributing editor to Streaming Media Magazine, writing about codecs and encoding tools. I have written multiple authoritative books on video encoding, including Video Encoding by the Numbers: Eliminate the Guesswork from your Streaming Video (https://amzn.to/3kV6R1j) and Learn to Produce Video with FFmpeg: In Thirty Minutes or Less (https://amzn.to/3ZJih7e). I have multiple courses relating to streaming media production, all available at https://bit.ly/slc_courses. I currently work as www.netint.com as a Senior Director in Marketing.

Check Also

Comparing Fixed GOPs to Variable GOPs with I-Frames at Scene Changes

I first encountered the line, “Anything worth doing is worth overdoing,” in the Robert Heinlein …

Real-World Perspectives on Choosing the Optimal GOP Size

One of the most fundamental encoding decisions is the size of the Group of Pictures …

Three Things to Know About 2-Pass x265 Encoding

Here are three things to know about 2-pass x265 encoding with FFmpeg.  If you’re using …

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *