Best SVT-AV1 Bitrate Control Technique for Live Streaming

Related Articles

Optimizing x265 with FFmpeg

October 22, 2026

When Will AV2 and VVC Be Worth Deploying?

October 8, 2026

Why CDN77 Chose NETINT Quadra for Large-Scale Live Transcoding

September 29, 2026

Optimizing x264 Settings and Per-title ladders

September 25, 2026

There are four bitrate control techniques worth considering for live encoding/transcoding using the SVT-AV1 codec. These are:

• Capped CRF
• VBR
• Capped VBR
• Constrained VBR

Here’s what I found: Overall:

• Capped CRF shows promise with significant bitrate savings, good quality retention, and the best overall performance by ~10 – 25% (meaning more streams from the same hardware).
• VBR was generally the best of the three VBR variants.
• Capped VBR was very similar to VBR with no significant advantages (again, in the live use case).
• Constrained VBR produced a more consistent bitrate, but had:
  • The highest peak bitrates (potential deliverability issues).
  • The lowest average VMAF score of the three VBR variants.
  • The lowest low-frame quality scores, indicating the potential for transient quality issues.
• Bottom line: Either use VBR or capped CRF.

You can download a report detailing these findings here. No registration is required.