I was reading through some material on Adobe's web site (specifically, here) and noticed the following table, which I've copied verbatim, along with the explanatory note. Citing an August, 2008 IDC study that's referenced below, the table states that

According to IDC, 94% of consumers can play streams of 1200 or higher

I was reading through some material on Adobe’s web site (specifically, here) and noticed the following table, which I’ve copied verbatim, along with the explanatory note. Citing an August, 2008 IDC study that’s referenced below, the table states that 94% of all consumers polled by IDC had downstream bandwidth sufficient to retrieve and play a streaming video file produced at 1200 kbps. In addition, 69% of all viewers could retrieve a 2400 kbps file.

I figured it was worth a post, because most sites that I’ve reviewed are producing at much lower bitrates than even 1200 kbps. If you haven’t reviewed your streaming parameters recently, perhaps these stats wil provide some motivation. As they say, either go big, or don’t go at all.

Video size types Video size 4:3 aspect size 16:9 aspect size Total bit rate (Kbps) Video bit rate (Kbps) Audio bit rate (Kbps) % US broadband consumers* QCIF 176×144 144×108 192×144 192×108 256×144 48
96
32
80 16 (mono)
16 (mono) Modem and ISDN
2% CIF 352×288 288×216 320×240 384×216
384×216 300
500
268
372 32 (stereo)
128 (stereo) Low-end DSL
4% D1 720×486 640×480
640×480 852×480
852×480 800
1200
672
1072 128 (stereo)
128 (stereo) Faster DSL
25% HD 1280×720 –
– 1280×720
1280×720 1800
2400
1672
2272 128 (stereo)
128 (stereo) Cable modems
69%

* Note: Based on the IDC 2008 Consumer Panel Broadband Survey. Each figure represents the percentage of users who have the bandwidth to support the respective total bit rate in that category. For example, 25% of users have bandwidth of at least 1200 Kbps to support the D1 video type but don’t have the higher bandwidth needed to support the next higher bit rate of 1800 Kbps.

About Jan Ozer

Avatar photo
I help companies train new technical hires in streaming media-related positions; I also help companies optimize their codec selections and encoding stacks and evaluate new encoders and codecs. I am a contributing editor to Streaming Media Magazine, writing about codecs and encoding tools. I have written multiple authoritative books on video encoding, including Video Encoding by the Numbers: Eliminate the Guesswork from your Streaming Video (https://amzn.to/3kV6R1j) and Learn to Produce Video with FFmpeg: In Thirty Minutes or Less (https://amzn.to/3ZJih7e). I have multiple courses relating to streaming media production, all available at https://bit.ly/slc_courses. I currently work as www.netint.com as a Senior Director in Marketing.

Check Also

Five star review for video quality metrics course.

New Five Star Review for Video Quality Metrics Course

The Computing and Using Video Quality Metrics course teaches encoding pro to compute and use video metrics like VMAF, PSNR, and SSIM.

Figure shows the different components to live streaming latency.

The Quality Cost of Low-Latency Transcoding

While low-latency transcoding sounds desirable, low-latency transcode settings can reduce quality and may not noticeably …

NAB Session on AI in Video Streaming

Like most encoding professionals, I’ve followed AI-related streaming advancements for the last few years. I’m …

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *